Human rights violations in Sweden

United Nations (UN) recognizes mars 24 as the International Day for the right to the truth concerning gross human rights violations and for the dignity of victims today. According to Article 18 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, every human being has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

Most countries in the world have signed United Nations declaration about human rights. And according to the European Convention of Human Rights which came into force in 1953 shall every citizen in the European Union have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. But how does that work in practice? Has healthcare professionals in Sweden the same statutory right as their Dutch colleagues to follow their conscience and refuse to take part in life-ending activities like euthanasia (assisted suicide) or abortions?

Not giving healthcare professionals the right of freedom of conscience is a violation of basic human rights and has forced healthcare professionals from Sweden to migrate or commute to Countries who follows UN:s Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention of Human Rights. In a way one could call them political refugees because they are refused work in Sweden and have to find work in other countries to get the basic human rights that their own country refuses them.

You can read more about the Nuremberg defense and human rights violations in Sweden in the following link: http://chasid68.blogspot.se/2014/02/the-nurnberg-defense.html

Text and Photo: Mikael Good

The Nuremberg Defense

During the Nuremberg trials that was held between october 1945 and may 1949 many of the accused nazis excused their horrible crimes against humanity with the expression: "I Was Just Following Orders and the law of my nation". Lawful superior orders often known as the Nuremberg defense is a plea in a court of law that a person, whether a member of the army or a civilian, not to be held guilty for actions that was ordered by a superior officer or a public official. 

The Nuremberg defense was not accepted by the judges at the Nuremberg trial who judged that every individual are responsible for their own actions against other human beings despite the laws of the nation or which orders that are given. In their judgement the judges in Nuremberg affirmed the principle of the freedom of conscience. According to the European Convention of Human Rights shall every citizen in the European Union have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. The right to freedom of conscience are often misunderstood in Sweden, the right to invoke freedom of conscience can only be used if healthcare personal have to take part in life-ending activities like abortion or euthanasia (assisted suicide).

In Liberal countries like the Netherlands, Denmark or Belgium as well as in conservative countries like Poland and Italy are freedom of conscience and religion for healthcare professionals a statutory right. Healthcare professionals in those countries don't have to take part in life-ending activities. Their Swedish colleagues don't have that freedom and they risk to lose their job if they decide to rely on their basic human rights and follow their conscience and refuse to obey a given order to take a life. One can ask the question why other countries should listen to Swedish politicians and organizations in democracy issues when they can't live up to their high standards and provide basic human rights like freedom of conscience and religion for it's own citizens?

"Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech." - Benjamin Franklin, 1722.

Text and Photo: Mikael Good